Cost of Living: Los Angeles, CA vs Chicago, IL
Analyzing index metrics between Los Angeles and Chicago relative to the US average baseline (100). Los Angeles is estimated to be 30% more expensive overall than Chicago. Rental housing in Chicago runs about 24% lower than in Los Angeles.
Side-by-Side Index Breakdown
| Index Category | Los Angeles, CA | Chicago, IL | Difference for Chicago |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Cost of Living | 150 | 120 | -20% |
| Rent Index | 170 | 130 | -24% |
| Home Price Index | 190 | 135 | -29% |
| Utilities | 115 | 105 | -9% |
| Groceries | 130 | 110 | -15% |
| Transportation | 135 | 118 | -13% |
| Healthcare | 120 | 112 | -7% |
Los Angeles, CA
Read a complete breakdown of rent distributions, home pricing indexes, utility rates, and local services in Los Angeles.
Chicago, IL
Read a complete breakdown of rent distributions, home pricing indexes, utility rates, and local services in Chicago.
Planning a move between these cities?
Cost of living indexes provide a directional guide, but real rent rates, local tax regulations, and commute patterns fluctuate by neighborhood.
Connect with a local RentX network professional to request current rental listings, real estate market guides, and personalized transition assistance.
Cost of Living Comparison: Los Angeles, CA vs Chicago, IL
This side-by-side cost-of-living comparison analyzes the financial differences between Los Angeles, CA (overall index 150) and Chicago, IL (overall index 120). Los Angeles, CA is estimated to be 30% more expensive overall than Chicago, IL. Use this data to plan your monthly budget and compare housing, transit, utility, and grocery expenses.